Drug Database
BE

benzodiazepine

✓ Approved

Valenta Pharm · Small Molecule · Small Molecule

What is benzodiazepine?

benzodiazepine is a small molecule developed by Valenta Pharm. It is approved for therapeutic indications via oral (po).

Drug Profile

CompanyValenta Pharm
Drug ClassSmall Molecule
RouteOral (PO)
StatusApproved

Therapeutic Indications

benzodiazepine is developed for 1 unique indication across 1 therapeutic area.

Therapeutic AreaConditionPhase
Psychiatric disordersAnxiety✓ Approved

Related Research Articles

PubMedPublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)2026-11-11

Long-Term Benzodiazepine Prescribing in Massachusetts: A 10-Year Longitudinal Study.

Dalvi Netrali N, DeNufrio Valerio Danielle D, Young Leonard D LD

Benzodiazepines are one of the most widely prescribed classes of medications in the United States. However, long-term benzodiazepine (LTB) prescribing may result in potential misuse and dependency. While standard definitions of LTB use are not uniformly applied in clinical settings, we examined LTB prescribing patterns in Massachusetts using a definition based on a review of the literature. We conducted a descriptive analysis of Massachusetts Prescription Monitoring Program data from 2013 through 2023. We identified people with LTB use as any benzodiazepine-naïve individual (no prescription for 365 d prior) whose days' supply of benzodiazepines was ≥30% (109 d) during a full 365-day period, beginning from their initial prescription. We followed people with LTB use for subsequent 365-day cycles (follow-up years 1-10) through 2023. We reported and stratified the prevalence of LTB use by age and gender. The baseline group of benzodiazepine-naïve Massachusetts residents included 339 481 people. Females across all age groups comprised a larger part of the baseline group (63.8%; n = 216 751) than males. Overlap of benzodiazepine and opioid agonist days' supply among people with LTB use declined slightly from 32.8% in follow-up year 1 to 29.1% in follow-up year 10. In Massachusetts, 4.4% (n = 14 905) and 2.0% (n = 6621) of the baseline group continued to meet LTB criteria at 5 and 10 years, respectively. In Massachusetts, 2% of the baseline continued to receive benzodiazepines after 10 years. Defining LTB use and benzodiazepine equivalence could promote safer benzodiazepine prescribing.

PubMedJournal of general internal medicine2026-11-11

Persistence of Benzodiazepines After Initiation in Patients Prescribed Long-term Opioids: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Fenton Joshua J JJ, Fang Shao-You SY, Stewart Susan S, Tseregounis Iraklis Erik IE et al.

Patients prescribed long-term opioids are often co-prescribed benzodiazepines, which heighten overdose risk. To assess the persistence of new opioid-benzodiazepine co-prescriptions and identify patient characteristics associated with persistent co-prescription. Retrospective cohort study. Data from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse, which includes de-identified medical and pharmacy claims and enrollment records for commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees across the United States. U.S. adults with a new benzodiazepine prescription (≥ 3 days' supply) from July 1, 2016 to December 31, 2021, who were prescribed opioids for ≥ 80% of days during a 6-month baseline period and no benzodiazepines in the prior year. Days of overlapping opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions during 30-day periods for up to 1 year of follow-up, classified as 0, 1-10, 11-24, and ≥ 25 days. The study included 32,815 patients with mean follow-up of 9.9 months. Initial benzodiazepine prescriptions were written by primary care physicians (47.9%), psychiatrists (5.2%), or other specialties (46.9%). At month 12, 25.7% had persistent opioid-benzodiazepine overlap. Compared to patients with 1-10 days of overlap in month 1, those with 11-24 days had significantly increased odds of higher overlap at month 12 [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for 11-24-day overlap at month 12: 3.58 (95% CI: 3.03-4.22); aOR for ≥ 25-day overlap: 3.65 (3.07-4.33)]; those with ≥ 25 days of month 1 overlap had even greater risk [aOR for 11-24 day overlap at month 12: 4.48 (3.85-5.22); aOR for ≥ 25 day overlap: 9.73 (8.37-11.32)]. Patients whose initial benzodiazepine prescriber was a psychiatrist were significantly more likely to have ≥ 25 days' overlap in month 1 (aOR vs. primary care physician: 2.45 [2.10-2.85]). Persistent opioid-benzodiazepine co-prescription is common following benzodiazepine initiation in patients prescribed long-term opioids, and greater days of initial overlap increases risk of long-term co-prescription.

PubMedAesthetic plastic surgery2026-11-11

From Lipoabdominoplasty to Lipedema Surgery: New Perspectives on Reducing Benzodiazepine Use.

Albanese Roberta R, Tomaselli Federica F, Tambasco Damiano D

PubMedEpilepsy research2026-11-10

Early benzodiazepine treatment and electrographic seizures after febrile status epilepticus.

Inui Takehiko T, Togashi Noriko N, Haginoya Kazuhiro K

PubMedNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026-11-10

From phenytoin to pragmatism: evolution of second-line antiseizure medications for established convulsive status epilepticus.

Ngadimon Irma Wati IW, Lim Kheng-Seang KS, Yow Hui-Yin HY, Fong Si-Lei SL

The choice of intravenous (IV) second‑line antiseizure medication (ASM) in established convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) remains a key determinant of outcome yet has evolved largely in response to pragmatic constraints rather than definitive comparative superiority. Over the past seven decades, management has shifted from barbiturates and paraldehyde to phenytoin, and subsequently to fosphenytoin, valproate, levetiracetam, and, more recently, lacosamide. Early International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) task force reports highlighted marked global variability in practice and emphasised rapid treatment escalation but did not endorse a preferred second-line agent. Contemporary evidence, including the American Epilepsy Society (AES) guideline and the Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT), has reshaped second-line treatment, with ESETT demonstrating similar observed treatment success with fosphenytoin, valproate, and levetiracetam. Lacosamide has also emerged as a potential alternative, although randomised evidence is derived from nonconvulsive seizures and is therefore indirect for established CSE. This review synthesises the evolution of second‑line ASMs in established CSE following adequate benzodiazepine treatment, integrating pharmacological rationale, clinical trial evidence, and guideline development, while highlighting ongoing uncertainties in optimal agent selection and the positioning of newer therapies.

PubMedSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association2026-11-10

Endoscopist-directed propofol versus monitored anesthesia care in outpatient endoscopy: Quality and safety metrics.

Almadi Majid A MA, AlKhathami Mohammed S MS, Alamr Abdulrhman S AS, Al-Mansour Tareq A TA et al.

Endoscopist-directed propofol (EDP) is endorsed by multisociety guidelines for elective outpatient endoscopy in low-risk patients, yet formal credentialing pathways for EDP remain absent from some health systems. We report procedural quality and sedation safety metrics from comparing an initial EDP period with a subsequent monitored anesthesia care (MAC) period with the aim of generating the regional evidence base required to inform a national EDP credentialing framework. This is a retrospective before-after cohort study of 3,049 consecutive endoscopic procedures performed at a single consultant-led endoscopy unit. Two sequential periods were defined by the date on which an attending anesthesiologist joined the unit: EDP period (n = 1,037; propofol directed by the performing gastroenterologist) and MAC period (n = 2,012; propofol directed by the anesthesiologist). Neither period received concurrent benzodiazepine or opioid coadministration. Procedure-type mix, sex (46.3% female in both), and age (median 41.5 vs 43.3 years; P = 0.08) were well balanced between periods. The MAC period was associated with higher median propofol doses (150 vs 140 mg; P < 0.001), but there was no difference in cecal intubation rate (99.7% EDP vs 99.1% MAC; P = 0.57), PDR (26.4% vs 23.7%; P = 0.35), or polypectomy rate (20.7% vs 17.9%; P = 0.28). Zero documented adverse events were recorded in the EDP period versus one documented adverse event in the MAC period ( P = 1.00). All metrics in both periods exceeded ASGE, ESGE, and SGA benchmarks. In this retrospective single-center cohort, measured procedural-quality outcomes were similar during sequential EDP and MAC periods. Prospective multicenter studies with structured adverse-event capture should be performed.

+9996 more articles available with a free account

Sign up free to view all articles →

Ask about benzodiazepine