Drug Database
IN

indapamide (indapamide, Douglas)

✓ Approved

Douglas Pharmaceuticals Limited · SLC12A3 · Small Molecule

What is indapamide?

indapamide is a small molecule developed by Douglas Pharmaceuticals Limited. It is approved for therapeutic indications via oral (po).

Drug Profile

Brand Namesindapamide, Douglas
CompanyDouglas Pharmaceuticals Limited
Drug ClassSmall Molecule
Molecular TargetSLC12A3
RouteOral (PO)
StatusApproved

Mechanism of Action

Molecular Targets

indapamide acts on 1 molecular target:

SLC12A3solute carrier family 12 member 3 (NCCT, NCC)
Want deeper analysis?Noah AI can explain complex mechanisms and compare to similar drugs.

Therapeutic Indications

indapamide is developed for 1 unique indication across 1 therapeutic area.

Therapeutic AreaConditionPhase
Vascular disordersHypertension✓ Approved

Related Research Articles

PubMedPakistan journal of medical sciences2026-06-08

Drug-Induced Hyponatremia Surveillance: A disproportionality analysis based on FAERs database.

Xi Xin X, Bai Zhanfeng Z, Liu Songqing S, Dong Jie J

Mining the risk signals of drug-induced hyponatremia by the United States Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database, to provide reference for clinical safe medication. Adverse drug events related to drug induced hyponatremia were analyzed by disproportionality analysis using the FAERS data between 2004 to 2023 were downloaded (https://fis.fda.gov/extensions/FPD-QDE-FAERS/FPD-QDE-FAERS.html). A total of 1,306 drugs with identifiable risk signals were associated with Hyponatremia. Five drugs demonstrated the highest cases counts: furosemide (n=1,560), hydrochlorothiazide (n=1049), sertraline (n=899), omeprazole(n=864), citalopram (n=738). The pharmacovigilance analysis identified five substances exhibiting the strongest association signals: indapamide (ROR=91.46, 95% CI 83.38-100.32), hydrochlorothiazide (ROR=46.79, 95% CI 43.96-49.81), desmopressin (ROR=34.08, 95% CI 31.49-36.89), oxcarbazepine (ROR=24.47, 95% CI 22.72-26.37), and furosemide (ROR=24.11, 95% CI 22.91-25.37). Nivolumab (36.92%), bortezomib (30.58%), and zoledronic (29.36%) exhibited the highest proportional occurrence of target adverse events involving fatal or life-threatening outcomes. Additionally, clinical information about Drug-induced hyponatremia is absent from the Summary of Product Characteristics of 10 drugs in our study. We provide a list of drugs with risk signals for Hyponatremia. In clinical practice, it is helpful to identify the culprit drug early, and prevent it from further aggravation into a serious condition.

PubMedDrug design, development and therapy2026-05-21

Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan/Indapamide Combination Therapy versus Fimasartan Monotherapy in Patients with Essential Hypertension Inadequately Responding to Fimasartan 30 mg (FINEDUO): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study.

Youn Jong-Chan JC, Lee So-Young SY, Yu Cheol Woong CW, Sung Ki-Chul KC et al.

Effective blood pressure (BP) control in hypertension frequently requires combination therapy, particularly in patients whose BP is inadequately controlled by monotherapy. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of fimasartan (FMS) and indapamide (IND) sustained release (SR) combination therapy. In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, patients with hypertension who remained uncontrolled after a 4-week run-in with FMS 30 mg, were randomized to FMS 30 mg/IND SR 1.5 mg or FMS 30 mg, followed by forced titration to FMS 60 mg/IND SR 1.5 mg or FMS 60 mg after 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in sitting systolic BP (SiSBP) at week 8. Secondary endpoints included changes in sitting diastolic BP (SiDBP), BP control rates, response rates, and safety outcomes. Two hundred forty-eight patients were randomized (FMS/IND SR, n=126; FMS, n=122). At week 8, the least square mean reduction in SiSBP was greater with FMS/IND SR than with FMS (-17.9 vs -7.4 mmHg, P<0.0001). Significant improvements were also observed for SiSBP at week 4, SiDBP at week 4 and 8, and BP control rates and response rates. The safety profile was comparable between groups, with no significant differences in adverse events, including patients aged 65 years and older. FMS/IND SR combination therapy demonstrated superior antihypertensive efficacy, rapid BP control, and comparable safety to FMS monotherapy. This regimen may serve as an effective therapeutic option, particularly in elderly or high-risk hypertensive patients. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05878561.

PubMedActa crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications2026-05-08

An analogue of indapamide: crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 3-chloro-4-(N,N-diethynylsulfamo-yl)-N-(2-meth-yl-indolin-1-yl)benzamide.

Ramli Youssef Y, Al Garadi Wedad W, Essassi El Mokhtar EM, Kalonji Mubengayi Camille C et al.

The title mol-ecule, C22H20ClN3O3S, adopts a shallow cup-shaped conformation with the chloro-benzamide portion as the bottom. A puckering analysis of the five-membered ring indicates an envelope conformation. In the crystal, helical chains along the a-axis direction are formed by N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds reinforced by C-H⋯π(ring) and weak π-stacking inter-actions. No directed inter-actions between chains appear to exist. A Hirshfeld surface analysis was performed.

PubMedFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026-04-30

Case Report: A reversible autonomic-endothelial migraine pattern: a conceptual perspective illustrated by a clinical case.

Gromakovskis Vlodeks V

Migraine is commonly regarded as a primary neurovascular disorder; however, systemic endothelial and autonomic factors may modulate its expression and course. A 41-year-old male with a 10-year history of migraine without aura and vasomotor rhinitis experienced sustained remission after initiation of nebivolol 5 mg and (perindopril 5 mg/indapamide 1.25 mg/amlodipine 5 mg) once daily for mild hypertension. Attacks occurred 3-4 times per month-often on Saturdays-were triggered by strong odors such as perfume, and occasionally accompanied by nausea or vomiting. Headaches fulfilled ICHD-3 criteria for migraine without aura and initially responded to triptans. Within two weeks of therapy, blood pressure normalized and both migraine and nasal symptoms resolved. Remission persisted for 12 months. The temporal sequence and clinical pattern appear consistent with a clinical improvement that may involve endothelial and autonomic modulation, among several plausible contributors, including combined antihypertensive therapy. The patient's blood pressure remained within the physiological range throughout the observation period, indicating that the sustained remission extended beyond antihypertensive control per se. This case illustrates a hypothesis-generating clinical pattern potentially involving endothelial and autonomic modulation and highlights how vascular homeostasis and circadian autonomic factors may influence migraine chronification and remission.

PubMedEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy2026-04-30

Effect of intensive blood pressure and blood glucose control on cardiovascular outcomes driven by reductions in cardiovascular death and nephropathy: Win ratio analysis of ADVANCE Trial.

Bompoint Severine S, Billot Laurent L, Patel Anushka A, Woodward Mark M et al.

To re-analyse the ADVANCE (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation) trial using the win ratio approach to better understand the relative contributions of individual outcomes in a composite endpoint. We applied an unmatched win ratio analysis to the 11,140 participants of the ADVANCE trial, comparing intervention and control groups for blood pressure and glucose control. Outcomes were prioritised hierarchically by severity: cardiovascular death, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, nephropathy, and retinopathy. The ADVANCE trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00145925. For blood pressure lowering, the perindopril-indapamide group had a win ratio of 1.11 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.22, p=0.028) compared to placebo and a net benefit of 1.5% (95% CI 0.2% to 2.8%) for a number needed to treat (NNT) of 68 patients. For intensive glucose control, the win ratio was 1.10 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.20, p=0.027) compared to standard glucose control with a net benefit of 1.6% (95% CI 0.2% to 3.0%) for a NNT of 63 patients. When both interventions were combined the win ratio increased to 1.19 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.35, p=0.010) and the NNT decreased to 41 patients. Cardiovascular death and nephropathy were the main contributors to the observed benefits. The win ratio approach confirms the robustness of the original ADVANCE findings while providing a more detailed understanding of the relative importance of individual outcomes. This method enhances the interpretation and communication of composite endpoint analyses.

PubMedThe New England journal of medicine2026-04-22

Three Low-Dose Antihypertensive Agents in a Single Pill after Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Trident Research Group, Anderson Craig S CS, Chow Clara K CK, de Silva H Asita HA et al.

Blood-pressure reduction is the only proven treatment to prevent stroke. Whether a single pill that combines three antihypertensive drugs at low doses, in addition to standard antihypertensive treatment, can lower blood pressure more than standard care alone and reduce the risk of recurrent stroke after intracerebral hemorrhage is uncertain. We conducted a multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving patients with a history of intracerebral hemorrhage. Patients were eligible for the trial if they had a systolic blood pressure of 130 to 160 mm Hg at baseline and were in clinically stable condition. After a 2-week active run-in phase during which all the patients received a once-daily pill containing three antihypertensive agents at low doses (telmisartan at 20 mg, amlodipine at 2.5 mg, and indapamide at 1.25 mg; the triple pill), the patients were randomly assigned to continue receiving the triple pill or to receive matching placebo. The primary outcome was the first recurrent stroke. Secondary outcomes included blood-pressure control, major cardiovascular events, death from cardiovascular causes, and safety. Of 1670 patients who underwent randomization, 833 were assigned to receive the triple pill and 837 to receive placebo. The mean age of the patients was 58 years. At a median follow-up of 2.5 years, recurrent stroke had occurred in 38 patients (4.6%) in the triple-pill group and 62 (7.4%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.92; P = 0.02). The mean systolic blood pressure during follow-up was 127 mm Hg and 138 mm Hg, respectively. The incidence of major cardiovascular events was lower with the triple pill than with placebo (6.6% vs. 9.8%; P = 0.04). Serious adverse events occurred in 23.2% of the patients in the triple-pill group and 26.0% of those in the placebo group. Early discontinuation of the trial regimen due to an adverse event occurred in 13.6% and 6.0%, respectively. The most common adverse event leading to discontinuation was an increase of 20% or more in the serum creatinine level. Among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage, treatment with a combination of three low-dose antihypertensive agents in a single pill, in addition to standard care, was associated with a lower incidence of recurrent stroke and major cardiovascular events than placebo. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and the Brazilian Ministry of Health; TRIDENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02699645; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12616000327482.).

+1365 more articles available with a free account

Sign up free to view all articles →

Ask about indapamide