Drug Database
AT

atenolol + nifedipine (nifedipine/atenolol / Bresben / Niften)

✓ Approved

AstraZeneca UK Limited · ADRB1 · Small Molecule

What is atenolol + nifedipine?

atenolol + nifedipine is a small molecule developed by AstraZeneca UK Limited. It is approved for therapeutic indications via oral (po).

Drug Profile

Brand Namesnifedipine/atenolol, Bresben, Niften
CompanyAstraZeneca UK Limited
Drug ClassSmall Molecule
Molecular TargetADRB1, CACNA1C
RouteOral (PO)
StatusApproved

Mechanism of Action

Molecular Targets

atenolol + nifedipine acts on 2 molecular targets:

ADRB1adrenoceptor beta 1 (B1AR, RHR)
CACNA1Ccalcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 C (CaV1.2, CACNL1A1)
Want deeper analysis?Noah AI can explain complex mechanisms and compare to similar drugs.

Therapeutic Indications

atenolol + nifedipine is developed for 2 unique indications across 2 therapeutic areas.

Therapeutic AreaConditionPhase
Cardiac disordersAngina pectoris✓ Approved
Vascular disordersHypertension✓ Approved

Related Research Articles

PubMedNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026-08-25

A novel CACNA1S variant associated with diltiazem-related worsening of hypokalemic periodic paralysis: a case report.

Sugiura Hidenori H, Watanabe Kazuki K, Furuhashi Kai K, Kawano Tatsuhiro T et al.

Hypokalemic periodic paralysis (HypoPP) is a skeletal muscle channelopathy characterized by recurrent episodes of transient paralysis associated with hypokalemia. Most cases are caused by heterozygous missense variants in CACNA1S, which encodes the α1 subunit of the skeletal muscle L-type calcium channel (CaV1.1). Known triggers include excessive carbohydrate intake, rest after strenuous exercise, and emotional stress; however, worsening potentially associated with the use of L-type calcium channel blockers (LTCCBs) has not been well documented. A 68-year-old man with HypoPP and a five-generation family history of the disease developed increased frequency of paralytic attacks and progressive muscle weakness after initiation of LTCCBs (nifedipine and diltiazem) for vasospastic angina. Exome sequencing and segregation analysis identified a novel heterozygous CACNA1S variant (NM_000069.3:c.4097T > G, p.(Met1366Arg)), which co-segregated with disease among genotyped affected family members and was classified as likely pathogenic. Despite continued nifedipine therapy, paralytic episodes ceased following discontinuation of diltiazem, and muscle strength improved. The p.(Met1366Arg) variant is located in the S6 segment of CaV1.1, outside the canonical S4 arginine residues implicated in most cases of CACNA1S-related HypoPP; nevertheless, strong intrafamilial segregation evidence supports its pathogenicity. Furthermore, its proximity to the diltiazem-binding site raises the possibility of altered drug-channel interactions. The observed diltiazem-associated worsening of HypoPP may be variant-specific rather than a class effect of LTCCBs. Nevertheless, careful monitoring may be warranted when prescribing these agents to patients with HypoPP.

PubMedAnalytical methods : advancing methods and applications2026-08-20

Analysis of real water samples with AQbD microextraction using thymol-based NADES: implications of uncontrolled hypertension risk in Egypt.

Elbalkiny Heba T HT, Nasry Elsaiad E, Nayer Marina M, Ahmed Sohaila S et al.

The global burden of hypertension and its severe form, resistant hypertension, affecting up to 20% of 1.4 billion adults worldwide, drives mass consumption of multiple drugs. Consequently, antihypertensive agents from different classes enter aquatic environments, yet simultaneous extraction of such chemically diverse drugs remains challenging. This work developed a green analytical method for the simultaneous determination of three model antihypertensive agents from distinct classes, namely, furosemide, atenolol, and lisinopril, in water samples. The method employed dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction using a thymol-based natural deep eutectic solvent selected for its superior hydrophobicity and tunability across varying analyte polarities and acid-base characteristics. Extraction was optimized via Box-Behnken design, followed by HPLC-UV analysis on a phenyl column with gradient elution (detection at 220 nm). The validated method showed good linearity (furosemide: 2-100 µg L-1, lisinopril: 5-100 µg L-1, and atenolol: 0.1-50 µg L-1) with LODs of 0.18, 0.66, and 0.031 µg L-1, respectively. The practical applicability of the developed method was evaluated by analyzing real water samples collected from multiple sites across Egypt. The results revealed detectable concentrations of the target pharmaceuticals in several samples, confirming the presence of these contaminants in Egyptian water systems. Specifically, furosemide was detected at 4.72 µg L-1, atenolol at 0.43 µg L-1, and lisinopril at 7.21 µg L-1 in samples collected from Giza. A comprehensive greenness assessment using the GAPI, AGREE, BAGI, and EVG tools confirmed strong alignment with sustainable chemistry principles. By enabling multi-class extraction of antihypertensive drugs with a low-ecological-footprint NADES-based protocol, this method addresses a critical gap as no prior NADES-based method exists for these three therapeutic classes together, supporting environmental monitoring and clean water objectives.

PubMedSurgery2026-08-19

Impact of chronic beta-blocker versus renin-angiotensin inhibitor use on outcomes after blunt pelvic trauma.

Dhalla Zeyanna Z, Nunn Kaitlin K, Teoh Victoria V, Arellano Diana D

Chronic cardiovascular medications, including β-blockers and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, may modify the physiologic response to trauma. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of pelvic fracture patients with preinjury β-blockers versus renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use after blunt pelvic trauma. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using TriNetX. Data was collected from 2015 to 2025, with a total sample size of n = 442,947 distributed across 16 comparison groups. Propensity score matching was applied to yield equitable cohorts based on medical comorbidities. Patient groups were mutually exclusive, such that individuals were classified as taking either a β-blocker or a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, with exclusion of patients receiving both therapies or an antiplatelet treatment. Comparisons were made with outcomes that include hemorrhage, infections, pneumonia, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, respiratory ventilation, and mortality. The β-blocker group demonstrated higher rates of adverse events, including hemorrhage, infections, pneumonia, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, respiratory ventilation, and mortality, relative to the renin-angiotensin system inhibitor group. The differences were most pronounced when renin-angiotensin system inhibitors were compared with metoprolol and labetalol, where nearly all outcomes were significantly worse in the β-blocker cohorts. In contrast, no significant differences were observed when compared with carvedilol or atenolol. Prior use of β-blockers is correlated with significantly worse rates of hemorrhage, infection, and thromboembolic events after a traumatic pelvic fracture when compared with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. This could be due to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors attenuating the post-traumatic inflammatory response system by blocking angiotensin II, which causes inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and vasoconstriction. These findings suggest that chronic cardiovascular therapy type may influence post-pelvic trauma outcomes, underscoring the need for further investigation.

PubMedPregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026-08-14

Hypertension-related morbidity after delivery discharge: A comparison of nifedipine versus labetalol.

Fabricant Sonya S, Cervantes Matthew M, Marshall Glenda G, Bello Natalie N et al.

To evaluate rates of hypertension-related morbidity after delivery discharge among individuals on nifedipine versus labetalol monotherapy. This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals who delivered at a level IV obstetric hospital from January 1, 2021 to January 20, 2024, had a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, and were discharged on nifedipine or labetalol monotherapy. The primary outcome was hypertension-related post-discharge morbidity, defined as any of the following within 30 days of delivery discharge: severe hypertension, de novo preeclampsia lab abnormalities, or new-onset clinical morbidity (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets [HELLP] syndrome, eclampsia, pulmonary edema/acute heart failure, cerebrovascular disorders, myocardial infarction/cardiac arrest, liver hematoma, or acute renal failure). Secondary outcomes included hypertension-related hospital return and hospital return length of stay. Data were abstracted from the medical record. Logistic regression and bivariate analysis were used to compare groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for baseline characteristics and readmission risk factors from the literature. Of 360 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 67.2% were discharged on nifedipine and 32.8% were discharged on labetalol. Nifedipine recipients had lower body mass index and were less likely to have chronic hypertension compared to labetalol recipients. Post-discharge morbidity occurred less frequently among individuals discharged on nifedipine compared to labetalol (1.7% vs. 10.2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.5). Individuals on nifedipine were less likely to return to the hospital in the 30 days following discharge (4.6% vs. 12.7%; aOR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7) and less likely to have a hospital return lasting ≥24 h (1.7% vs. 6.8%; OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.07-0.8). Among individuals on antihypertensive monotherapy at delivery discharge, nifedipine was associated with significantly reduced odds of post-discharge morbidity compared to labetalol.

PubMedActa dermato-venereologica2026-08-13

Enalapril, Atenolol, Alendronate and DRESS Syndrome - A Case Report.

Olsson S Bertil SB, Ehinger Mats M

PubMedHealth science reports2026-08-11

Labetalol, Nifedipine, and Methyldopa for the Management of Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy in Iran: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Goudarzi Zahra Z, Nouhi Mojtaba M, Bordbar Najmeh N

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy create major clinical and economic burdens on maternal health services, making evidence on efficient resource allocation and cost-effectiveness essential for treatment decisions. However, no clear consensus exists on the most cost-effective antihypertensive therapy in Iran. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of methyldopa, labetalol, and nifedipine in pregnant women in Iran. A decision-analytic model was created using a decision tree framework to compare the cost-effectiveness of labetalol with nifedipine and methyldopa. The model used data from published randomized clinical trials and relevant literature. A hypothetical group of pregnant women aged 18 and older, at least 28 weeks pregnant, and experiencing severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure of 160 mmHg or higher, or diastolic blood pressure of 110 mmHg or higher), was studied over 4 months. The analysis considered the viewpoint of healthcare payers. Costs were measured in US dollars, and health outcomes were represented in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). A willingness-to-pay threshold of $18,261 per QALY was set. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, including 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, were conducted to evaluate uncertainty. In the base-case analysis, nifedipine provided the highest QALYs (0.21), followed by labetalol (0.19) and methyldopa (0.16). The total costs were $607 for nifedipine, $500 for labetalol, and $847 for methyldopa. Labetalol was less expensive and more effective than methyldopa, making it the dominant choice. Compared to nifedipine, labetalol was not cost-effective at the specified willingness-to-pay threshold. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that labetalol was cost-effective in 70% of simulations against methyldopa and 29% against nifedipine. From the perspective of Iranian healthcare payers, labetalol is a cost-saving and dominant option compared to methyldopa. However, it is not cost-effective when compared to nifedipine at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $18,261 per QALY in managing hypertensive disorders during pregnancy.

+9996 more articles available with a free account

Sign up free to view all articles →

Ask about atenolol + nifedipine